One Question for Kare Anderson

Kare Anderson is an Emmy-winning former NBC and Wall Street Journal reporter who now writes the Connected and Quotable column at Forbes, and speaks on communicating-to-connect. She’s the author of Moving From Me to We and co-founder of the Say it Better Center.

Q: What’s the most significant risk you’ve taken professionally?

Kare:   As a Wall Street Journal reporter, in my second week of work, based in London, and with no background in economics, I was told to interview one of the foremost economists in Europe.

He was so enraged by my “ineptitude” and “ignorance” that were “blindingly evident within minutes of my interview” that he stood up and started pointing and shouting at me in his office with the door open. Yes, I remember those exact words and phrases, and those are the ones that are “clean” enough for me to repeat here.

I kept asking for clarification of his terms and concepts and that irritated him more. A small crowd was forming
just outside his door. I could hear tittering. The economy was bumpy then and he felt strongly about what the government should do. I simply did not understand him at first and it took quite awhile for me to decipher a couple of his views so (barely) adequately write my story.  My boss, the bureau chief was not happy with me when I returned and told him what had happened, including how he finally kicked me out of his office. Walking through that parade of chuckling staffers was not my best moment especially as he had spilled coffee on my skirt during one of his outbursts… I mean clarifications. He wrote a letter to the editor, quite articulately and vividly citing my flaws as a reporter. There were 30.

Yet several people wrote letters say they finally understood the underlying economic theory. That’s what most mattered to me, yet I know the writing was not my strongest because of the pressures I felt, being new to a news bureau and a country.

The unexpected upside for me (and I DO mean unexpected) was that his letter apparently boosted readership of my story… and many people, especially women, expressed outrage at him for his personal attacks. Even more women and men wrote letters to the editor in the coming weeks in support of me because the economist made the mistake of responding to some of the attacks by counter-attacking people by name, thus escalating it. I found it mortifying.

My boss was thankful that the battled was made personal, rather than about my “thin coverage” (his polite phrase) in my original story – and that the back and forth story had legs, getting picked up by other media outlets. My nimble French interpreter (I was moved around Europe and she spoke seven languages) and I bonded over the incident. She was wonderfully protective and reached out to her well-placed friends and family members to fan the flames of the story, I learned months later.

Ironically the visibility made people curious about me so it was easier to secure interviews. Above all it cemented my habit of doing more advance research before an interview and to grow credibility in one, specialized beat so it was less likely I had to cover stories outside my area of expertise.


  1. Amusing story with a strong lesson–namely that even the worst encounters might yield unpredictable benefits. The man you interviewed was guilty of bullying, long before we started denouncing that cowardly behavior. Glad you became the winner in this situation.

    • I appreciate your comment about bullying, and the story of the staffers (in my own interpretation) ‘gleefully’ watching tells me they were used to the same treatment and happy to see it happen to someone else.

      What I was waiting for in the story was to hear that Kare’s innocent and naive questions, asking for clarification, would have served to educate more people about this person’s ideas, thereby enhancing the reputation of his intellect and ability to address and solve complex societal problems.

      I believe that her article could have been brilliant and award winning even in her early career if the gentleman had recognized her ability to see the issue from the eyes of the common person. By helping her understand and collaborate together to help others as well, he would have had a “swan song” oppty to seal his own legacy.

      Too bad his bad-temper and pride blinded him to that chance.

  2. Very inspiring. Kare is an amazing person and this incident highlights her incredible fortitude in turning a situation into a positive one. Thanks for sharing!

  3. Love, love, love Kare Anderson. What a consummate professional. That she was outside her comfort zone with this interview and yet approached the experience (and after-experience) from the perspective of what she learned about herself and other people is very telling indeed.

    I love the way her story ended, that the back-and-forth actually served to capture the interest of additional media outlets. Inspiring.

    • Anne Kreamer says:

      Thanks, Judy. Getting outside your comfort zone and then learning from the stretch really is the key, isn’t it? So glad you liked the post.