life

My Anniversary Pearls by Anne Kreamer

My husband, Kurt, and I met on a blind date on November 4, 1977. He was 23; I was 21. It was a madcap evening: After a classical concert at Carnegie Hall, we dined at a restaurant we considered swanky at the time, played Pong at a video arcade, and ended up dancing into the morning at a disco, amid a dry-ice haze. It still stands as the datiest date of our lives. We married four years later, in May 1981, but every year, we’ve chosen to celebrate our relationship on the anniversary of that wonderful first night together.

Each year, Kurt has been a thoughtful, careful gift giver. But on our 30th blind-date commemoration, in 2007, he outdid himself. On the public radio show that he hosts, he broadcast a love song for me that he had commissioned from a balladeer-for-hire. The lyrics, referring to our respective hometowns—“If I’d jumped into the Missouri River in Omaha when I was 17 and had it carry me down to Kansas City, I bet you would have rescued me…”—moved me to tears. Later came yet another, more private present.

On the card affixed to a wrapped box were three cryptic numbers: 10,957; 30; and 1. Thirty, I understood; the others, I wasn’t so sure about. When I opened the box, it became clear. He had given me one beautiful spherical crystal vase, filled with 10,957 miniature seed pearls, representing the number of days in our years together, and 30 full-size pearls indicating those years.

I was moved, and surprised, too. Pearls are traditionally associated with the 30th wedding anniversary. And tradition has never featured prominently in our lives as a couple: I kept my maiden name when we got married; I didn’t want an engagement ring; I refused to wear a standard wedding veil.

But soon I gained a deeper understanding of the gesture. Pearls are hard to harvest, and it can take years for the layers of nacre to form over a grain of sand, transforming it into a plump, iridescently lustrous pearl. The metaphor for a long marriage is obvious—from nothing, slowly but surely, despite and maybe because of the grit and grime a couple endures together, comes something lovely.

Today, when I glance at the vase nestled near my desk, as it dynamically reflects the changing light of the day, I smile, thinking of Kurt’s romantic, indulgent folly. Of how many hours it must have taken Kurt to count those 10,957 miniscule pearls. And I marvel once again at how poetically they embody the giddy night that we came together, and the life that we’ve shared ever since.

Aging: A Different Kind of Utopia by Anne Kreamer

Do you ever find yourself up late at night worrying about what's going to happen to you when you get old? Anxious about whether you've managed finances well enough to take care of your needs for the long haul? And for those of you with kids, concerned that they might not want to deal with your problems, particularly if they no longer live anywhere nearby? Well, I do. But I've also started thinking about different kinds of ways I might proactively allay some of those concerns. About 20 of us have been members of the same New York City book club for almost a decade. The average age is around 60; I think I'm the youngest. Almost three years ago we started a sort of parlor game imagining different ways we might live as we got older. And given that women will survive their husbands by an average of seven years - and all the women in our club are straight and married - the speculative elder-world of our all-female book club was, not surprisingly, female.

We thought we could pool all of our resources and buy a huge house in Manhattan. Each of us would have our own bedroom and we'd share the communal spaces. The savings we'd gain by not having individual homes we could use to hire a cook, a driver, a nurse (if needed) and probably an exercise instructor.

If we were fortunate in our planning we might even have enough capital to buy a second home maybe at the beach. All of us like each other and the idea of creating our own micro-community, a group with whom we could go out to dinner, and attend lectures and films and concerts and plays and remain culturally and socially active is appealing. And fiscally smart - why replicate many times over what we could consolidate?

A different fantasy, which includes my husband, is to buy a bit of land in some mild-winter locale with several friends. It would be a second home for some of us over the next decade or so, and a principal home for some of us in the years beyond that.

Each of us would build our own compact house - bedroom(s), living room, office(s) or studio - and again share communal spaces like the kitchen and dining areas. In this scheme we would also have a gardener/handyman, a pool and (when I'm driving the fantasy) a tennis court. The notion being that if we merged our resources we might be able to create something pretty grand, physically and socially.

As my husband and I have shared this notion with others they get excited. Since our kids still live at home, we haven't yet gone so far as to talk with a lawyer about the legal particulars of how this might work. Clearly there are lots of gritty problems like taxes and maintenance and inheritances and governance to figure out, but I've discovered that we aren't alone in thinking about innovative ways to create a new kind of community.

What we are talking and fantasizing about is called an Intentional Community - as the Intentional Community Web site defines it: "Intentional Community is an inclusive term for ecovillages, cohousing, residential land trusts, communes, student co-ops, urban housing cooperatives, and other projects where people strive together with a common vision." I scrolled through the site and discovered thousands of people forming all sorts of living groups.  The site is a great resource for any of you thinking about this.

I also decided to search "aging in place" and came up with 21 million hits, many of them excellent starting reference points. The term usually refers to retrofitting your current house so that you can stay living there no matter how old you get.

The trick with aging in place is to make the environment brighter and easier to navigate with shelving and appliances all made effortlessly accessible. It is also important to "outsource" other kinds of needs you might have - like the ones I imagine with my book club: driving, meal preparation, household maintenance, cleaning, and health care.

I find the sociological implications of these trends really interesting. As our families have splintered across the country, lots of us are clearly interested in creating new models for comfortable, collective living. And most of us are loath to burden family living far away when we age, yet the majority of us will need help in managing day-to-day life if we're lucky enough to beat the odds and make it past 80.

I think the industries serving this segment will only expand as more of us boomers tackle how we live in the future.

Would You Pay $100K for a Year of Life? by Anne Kreamer

The Mastercard ads say it all - "time with your family or loved ones, priceless." And if any of us were asked if we'd spend every penny we'd earned to save the life of a child or spouse, we'd say (perhaps) without batting an eye, "Whatever it takes, and then some." But unsentimental economists and health care consultants don't agree. And surprisingly, even the average American doesn't necessarily agree.

It turns out, according to a recent piece by Alex Berenson in the New York Times, that the average American values a year of life at between $100,000 and $300,000.

Health care economists derived this number by a variety of means - comparing the cost of dialysis versus blood pressure medicine, the inconvenience and pain associated with sleep apnea versus blindness and something called the standard gamble test.

In the test, "people are asked to imagine having the symptoms of a certain disease - the pain, loss of function and shortened life expectancy," according to Berenson, and then "the people are told that an operation exists that would cure them. But if the operations fails, the patient will die."

The more profound the disease (leukemia, severe diabetes) the more likely it is that the person will choose the risky operation.    And of course, the more severe the disease, the more likely it also will be that the costs associated with its treatment will be higher.

All this matters to each of us because "once they know how to rank the ‘costs' of various diseases, economists can determine the worthiness of a particular treatment." And if the treatment is not deemed worthy, health care won't cover its use.

I understand this from personal experience. When my father was dying in the early '90s of multiple myeloma, a type of cancer, some of the medicines that were used to keep him alive for a few more days costs thousands of dollars a day.

And many of those drugs were experimental (such as monoclonal antibodies) so, although we did not know it at the time, were not going to be covered by his health insurance. I know if you've also been through this situation, the last thing you feel capable of handling when someone you love is dying is deciding if a treatment is "worth" it.

But we don't live in a world with bottomless pockets and in America, land of an increasingly dysfunctional and unjust health care system, the question of who gets what treatment is enormously important.

As our society ages and as health care treatments and technology become ever more expensive, we need to create non-arbitrary and objective means to help us navigate the really hard choices that are coming.

And the health care industry needs to make the judgments and information transparent and available to everyone - before someone gets really sick and emotion clouds the choices we need to make.

How to Write a College Application Essay by Anne Kreamer

Tips For Writing An Argumentative Essay

This online essay thus saves each student from endless questioning from parents and also endless worries from teachers according to poor student performance. The presentation of an plagiarized paper is surely an indicator of the lack of seriousness on the students. Try to increase for the worst by listing possible solutions-such because "I usually understand a lot," "I usually reach harder," "I usually seek the help of an essay writing Maintenance," etc. This 's as to why there are several companies which are focused at assisting students with completing their academic assignments. The more troubling side to UK essay writing services.

I wish to point out some from the things students deciding on colleges ought not do or not include inside their college application essay:Writing college application essays could be scary. Afore we mentioned the professors resorting to online grading services, but there also will be the well-known fact that students often address the internet writing services for completion of the assignments. Some with the qualities will likely be examined in this short article briefly. This is a simple, but effective concept that triggers the student's writing motivation: the user gets a blank surface plus a group of words they are able to position nonetheless they want to be able to create their poetry. The following day edit it and possess someone else proof read it.

The son jerked up his go to find the source of the voice. If you would like help in Research Papers and Term Paper Help you can visit Buy Custom Essay Online. Students on tv and communication field find it difficult in selecting the right topic to adjust to their paper. Students ought to be keen when they are purchasing their already written essay papers from online companies. The reason is that you don't desire to hire an MBA student to create a college paper. Actually buy essay online is truly innovative style amid the students BuyEssayClub order essay and get discount dissertation writing requirements careful experience not to mention wide info about the individual which you can create a strong composition.

If you need a term paper, comparative essay or any writing project at all we're here to help you. Hogsmeade looked like a Christmas card; the miscroscopic thatched cottages and shops were all covered in a layer of crisp snow; there was holly wreaths around the doors and strings of enchanted candles hanging inside trees. Students can get term papers, related on their topics, through these services. Even when we know the sources how can we get use of those sources. When intending to give a persuasive speech, opt for the topic that would keep the viewer's interest intact rather than bore them immensely.

All you must do is describe what you require these to write about. Applying to a custom essay writing agency is the wisest decision if you are certainly not sure within your writing skills or if you merely lack time for practicing these bothering researches, processing tons of information and composing an essay. Our example essays are often a product of thorough research using one of the most up to date research materials and so students are guaranteed to getting relevant content after they use our example essays. Reviews are dependant on personal experience therefore, there is no guarantee that other will have had a similar experience. If you're printmaker, digital singer, photographer, sculptor, otherwise you render multiples of in the least kind, align the edition size, in no way loose put it back, and successively amount each part of your set inside the edition.

Transformational Leadership by Anne Kreamer

As I watched the last Presidential debate last night I couldn't stop thinking of the behavior of the two candidates in connection with my research on emotion at work. In the book, Emotions in the Workplace: Research, Theory and Practice, the authors presented the following insight: "...there is evidence that undesirable emotional states limit our cognitive functioning (Avia, 19917). Stress, for instance, hampers our ability to think (Zaccaro, 1995) and increases the tendency to make decisions based on experience rather than intelligence (Feidler, 1995)."

McCain sure seems stressed. To my mind, what otherwise might be construed as passion for his country comes across as anger. Anger at pretty much everything. Of the rabid dog kind. The behavior is not reassuring during a period of global chaos.

On the other hand, according to research found in Emotions in the Workplace, "The abilities to create and to test trust quickly are important. This forces one in the direction of reliable behavior. The final acid test then becomes: how comfortable is the other person, is he or she playing tricks, is there a hidden agenda, does he or she play games, and I at ease?"

I don't know about you, but Obama's measured, reliable behavior speaks to a quality of leadership that is tailored-made for these tough times. We need transformational leadership and Neal Ashkanasy, Charmine Hartel and Wilfred Zerbe, the author of the Emotions in the Workplace, presented this insight:

"...that transformational leadership is intrinsically associated with emotional intelligence. The resulting propositions are:

Proposition 11a: Compared to other leaders, transformational leaders have a clear understanding of their own emotions, and are more in touch with their own emotions.

Proposition 11b: Compared to other leaders, and because they are more in touch with their own emotions (P11a), transformational leaders are more able to regulate their own emotions.

Proposition 11c: Since they are more able to regulate their own emotions (P11b), transformational leaders are more emotionally stable and less stressed than other leaders.

Proposition 11d: Compared to other leaders, transformational leaders are better able to understand others' emotions.

Proposition 11e: Since they are better able to understand others' emotions (P11d), transformational leaders are more able than other leaders to emphasize with their followers.

Proposition 11f: Partly because they are better able to emphasize with their followers (P11e), transformational leaders are more able than other leaders to engender affective commitment among their followers."

Hmmm, based on the above, is there any question who has the right stuff to lead the charge for change?

Is Lack of Sleep Making Your Kid Stupid? by Anne Kreamer

My youngest child is slogging through the most sleepless year of her life. She’s a senior in high school trying to keep her head above water – like all kids her age, she’s got SATs and college applications and extracurricular activities and regular old classes. It’s intense and unrelenting and robs her of sleep every single night. I often wake up to find her light still on, the poor kid asleep with her books open. After five or six hours of sleep, she gamely tumbles down to breakfast and is out the door before 7 a.m. to get to school.

And she’s no different from most high school kids across the country. According to a recent piece by Po Bronson in New York Magazine, it’s a national crisis.

Even though most parents think their kid is getting enough sleep, according to the National Sleep Foundation, "60 percent of high school students report extreme daytime sleepiness."  And in a different study, some 25 percent of kids believe their grades have dropped because of a lack of sleep.

Bronson reports that from elementary school through high school, kids now get about an hour a night less of sleep than they did in the 1970s, when I was in high school.

"Because children’s brains are a work-in-progress until the age of 21, and because much of that work is done while a child is asleep, this lost hour appears to have an exponential impact on children that it simply doesn’t have on adults."

A survey of 7,000 high school students conducted by Dr. Kyla Wahlstrom of the University of Minnesota, and a different study by Mary Carskadon of Brown University of 3,000 Rhode Island high school students, found that kids who got A's averaged about 15 minutes more sleep per night of sleep than the kids who got B’s and B students averaged about 11 minutes more of sleep per night than those who got C’s. Who knows how much is cause and how much is effect, but that is a very big deal.

Some school systems are getting smart about sleep deprivation and starting school days later. In Edina, Minnesota, the results were mind blowing. "In the year preceding the time change" from 7:25 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., according to Bronson, "math and verbal SAT scores for the top 10 percent of Edina’s students averaged 1288. A year later, the top 10 percent averaged 1500, an increase that couldn’t be attributed to any other variable. 'Truly flabbergasting,' said Brian O’Reilly, the College Board’s executive director for SAT Program Relations, on hearing the results."

A school district in Lexington, Kentucky, that moved their start time an hour later was able to report a 16 percent reduction in teenage car accidents.

I knew my daughter wasn’t getting enough sleep but I never imagined how much it might be costing her. Instead of tutors, all our kids might need to excel is a little more sleep. How refreshing that something so elemental has such a big benefit.   Too bad I hadn’t read the piece before my daughter’s recent battery of SATs.

What Happened to Wellness? by Anne Kreamer

This month more than 4,000 people, primarily health care professionals, will attend the 15th Annual International Congress on Anti-aging Medicine and Regenerative Biomedical Technologies - at which more than 400 exhibitors will be trying to sell them devices and drugs and therapies. When the organization held its first meeting in 1993, 12 physicians participated. The motto of the group is "Adding quantity is not enough: learn to enhance the quality of your patients' lives."

As the organization states on its Web site, "in 1990 it was nearly unthinkable for a respected scientist to suggest that physiologic aging metabolism could be manipulated, slowed, or reversed with drug or biomedical interventions.

"Today anti-aging biosciences are the rage, with great advances in nanotechnology, genomic research, bio-identical HRT, gene therapy, stem cells, cloning, biomarker testing of aging, and human augmentation."

I think we are at a particularly pivotal and exciting point in anti-aging medicine. With two Type I diabetics in my extended family, I emphatically support leading-edge research that explores ways to eliminate debilitating and life-threatening disease.

A hundred years ago those members of my family would be dead; I pray that a cure might be discovered to eliminate the risk to my children. Medical innovation is a thing of wonder to a layperson like me. I am in awe of the potential of science to repair cataracts, or replace hips and hearts. So many people's lives are so profoundly improved or saved.

But on the consumer level, with products increasingly targeting non-chronically-ill people, I think the exploding anti-aging market also has a troubling side - our desire for quick fixes.

Last week at my local bookstore I counted 36 different books with Anti-Aging in their title. And another 21 with Stay Young in theirs. Many of the books used the word secret in their titles.  Many of the titles suggest 24-hour turn-arounds or quick, simple-step fixes for the health issues that plague our country.

In the quest for health it feels like the balance has shifted uncomfortably to anti-age as apposed to pro-health. Doing the proven things that are good for your long-term physical well-being - the duh things like maintaining a regular exercise program and limiting refined carbohydrates - require effort and time.

Wellness in its most inclusive form must embrace both technological innovation as well as personal involvement.

Women As Heroines of Their Own Lives by Anne Kreamer

This month, Anne exchanges email with Nora Ephron, film director and author of the recent play Imaginary Friends.

Anne Before you became a world-famous director of film comedies like Sleepless in Seattle and You've Got Mail, but after you graduated from being the most famous female journalist of your generation, you were a screenwriter. You wrote the movie Silkwood about a real-life corporate whistle-blower. So when Time named three women Persons of the Year for their whistle-blowing, I thought of Karen Silkwood. What attracted you to that story?

Nora What made Karen Silkwood a movie was that she was such an unexpected sort of whistle-blower. She was a real piece of work: complicated, difficult, and a bad candidate for industrial espionage, which is what she was engaged in at the time of her death. Sometimes the most unlikely people turn out to be heroes. That's Karen's story, in one of those one-sentence nutshells that studios love so much, and it's what made me want to write about her.

Anne Would any of the recent real-life whistle-blowing stories make a good film?

Nora So far, I haven't read anything that would make me think that their stories were movies as opposed to television movies, which are, of course, different things. Compare Karen Silkwood with Coleen Rowley [of the FBI], for in-stance, whose whistle-blowing is consistent with the way that she has lived her entire life. From a screenwriter's point of view, you don't have the sort of character development that you've got with Karen Silkwood.

Anne In 1996, when you gave the commencement address at Wellesley College, you admonished the young women to be the heroines of their lives. What did you mean?

Nora I didn't mean "heroines" in an epic sense. I meant heroines as protagonists, not supporting actors in the story of their own lives -- women who understand that they have choices and who have enough advantages that there's no one but themselves to blame if things don't turn out the way that they'd hoped. Someone very smart once wrote that the hardest thing for women to give up when they begin to achieve equality will be the habit of an alibi.

Anne We're not postfeminist -- we're post-alibi! You've worked in male-dominated professional worlds: journalism during the 1960s and 1970s and Hollywood during the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. How did those fields and eras differ in allowing women to be heroines?

Nora Journalism today is very different for women. When I started out at the New York Post in 1963, there were only two women reporters at the New York Times -- well, maybe three, but the point is that there were hardly any. The movie business has also changed dramatically in the past 10 years. There are many, many more women executives, producers, and agents. And while the number of women directors is small on a percentage basis, there are many more women directing.

Anne Given that you don't make "big" movies, is it more difficult than it was a decade ago for you to make the films that you want to make?

Nora It was hard 10 years ago, and it's even harder now. A studio would much rather make a $110 million action movie with a big star than a $10 million movie with a little one. I wish this weren't also true for the theater -- but it is. Bigger and dumber is better. And it's even true for publishing.

Anne Because big profits in blockbuster-sized tranches of cash are the obsession of the entertainment conglomerates.

Nora The dirty little secret of the movie business is that there are no profits. In fact, italicize that: There are no profits. The entire movie business is a Ponzi scheme that's set up to allow a small number of people to live lavishly. And those people -- many of whom went into the business because they wanted to make good movies -- after a few years, they just want to keep their jobs. They're sort of like Al Gore: They want to stay in office so badly that they've forgotten why they wanted the job in the first place.

Anne Al Gore syndrome: Preventing that chronic illness is something that we all need to do in our professional lives.

Out of the Past by Anne Kreamer

No one spoke of my grandfather Kreamer, not ever. Even his given name was a mystery. All anyone seemed to know was that he had disappeared before my father's fourth birthday. And when my father died a few years ago, I assumed that any hope of knowing anything more about my grandfather—his father—had evaporated. So last year, as I intermittently corresponded with a distant relative I'd met through an on-line genealogy site, I was stunned by the following e-mail from her: "My cousin just wrote me and sent the following text from an article she found this afternoon. Hope this isn't a shock to you." The newspaper story, from the February 16, 1927, edition of the Glen Elder Sentinel, was headlined "J. H. Kraemer Still Missing." (The routine misspelling of our name is obviously a longstanding phenomenon.) The paper went on to report that "J. H. Kraemer, missing cashier" from the local bank, "has never yet returned and no news has been obtained of his whereabouts. A good many people over the county still think that he will come back and assist in straightening out the affairs of the bank."

"Straightening out the affairs of the bank"—could a phrase be more suggestively, intriguingly vague and expansive?

The Glen Elder bank was affiliated with the State Bank of Downs, Kansas. Dan Harrison, from a prominent family in the area, had cofounded the Downs bank and served several terms as mayor, and several as a state senator. My grandmother, Catherine "Toots" Harrison Kreamer, was his daughter. It made sense that my grandfather Kreamer worked in his father-in-law's business.

But no wonder no one spoke of him. He wasn't just any criminal—he'd stolen from his in-laws!

This isotope of information meant just one thing: I needed to go to Downs, a farming community of 1,100 in north-central Kansas that I had last visited, from my hometown of Kansas City, when I was nine—39 years before.

I persuaded my 14-year-old daughter, Lucy, to accompany me on this Nancy Drew-ish adventure. There are no scheduled planes, passenger trains, or even buses that stop near Downs. We flew from New York to Omaha (where my mother-in-law lived) and rented a car for the six-hour trip west into the middle of the middle of America. The route we mapped to Downs, which is 20 miles south of the geographic center of the 48 contiguous states, was along Route 77, the Homestead Expressway, into Kansas and "Pony Express country" as a posted road sign announced. Our family is always inclined to drive the back roads, and in Kansas, where the speed limit on two-lane highways is 65 and all roads run clean and straight, those byways are efficient—and their vistas are sublime. I had mouthwateringly imagined stopping for dinner at some great little mom-and-pop restaurant for the chicken-fried steak with cream (not brown) gravy that I remembered from childhood. But over hundreds of Blue Highway miles there was no such place to be found. On the other hand, there were virtually no fast-food restaurants—the thin and declining Great Plains population density cannot support the national chains.

After a pizza dinner, we drove due west on Route 24, through the Flint Hills, the little-known, classic-western-movie scenery of north-central Kansas, into the twilight. As a kid, I'd endured the drive to my grandmother's house: flat tedious mile followed flat tedious mile. So I was surprised to find how much the landscape itself—the dramatic simplicity of infinite cornfields against the distant horizon—moved me. On no conscious level had I been aware, during these last 30 years on the East Coast, that this vast emptiness was inextricably linked to my notion of myself. I hadn't imagined how beautiful it would seem to me—or to Lucy, who was seeing it for the first time. We were giddy with space, and stopped repeatedly to take pictures of isolated clapboard churches; miles of glowing sunflower fields; white gravel roads serpentining through endless green corn; hulking, centipede-like irrigation systems hurling water into the dry soil; and abandoned farmhouses surrounded by cottonwood windbreaks whose canopies were punctuated by ramshackle mills. Dust devils bobbed and danced in distant fields. And the streaming plumes of dust roiled up by farmers out tilling their land billowed on the horizon. The bulbous water tower of each (barely) inhabited place seemed to cry, "Look, here, we exist!" long before any other human presence was visible.

We passed exactly two cars, both of them going east, during the final 45-minute stretch of our all-day trip. As we drove through Cawker City (population 585), I was disappointed by the "largest ball of twine in the world." In my memory it was a grand, wonderfully absurd, amber-colored sphere as big as a house, on display beneath a strikingly modernistic circa-1960 geodesic dome. But today it seemed more like a minivan-sized pile of dirty rags under a carport.

Glen Elder (population 448) looked as if a neutron bomb had been dropped on it. No one was out sitting or walking or puttering. Bikes had been left splayed on their sides in yards. Apparently empty buildings stood silent. These stretches of the plains are lands that time forgot—but for my time-traveling purposes that was a good thing. When we finally arrived in Downs, around nine at night, the town looked hardly different from the sepia-toned, panoramic 1901 photograph of Downs that hangs on my living room wall in New York. Driving along the main street, I remembered exactly my grandmother's old address, 509 Division Street, and was able to find it—as my father always said to congratulate himself and my mother on successful navigations—"like a homing pigeon."

Lucy and I made our base camp at the Howell House, an impeccably restored Victorian bed-and-breakfast. Our first stop the next morning was my grandmother's place, just a few minutes' walk away. My strongest memory of it had been the wraparound sleeping porch where we'd escaped the stifling summer heat and watched fireflies glimmer in Mason jars with lids punched by a rusty ice pick—our only source of light. The porch was gone, and the house "modernized" in ways I disliked, but the bones of the place were still there and anchored me in my grandmother's presence.

I was able to track down her nephews, Bill Harrison, a 79-year-old retired gallery owner living in Taos, New Mexico, and Bogue Harrison, 74, and living in Panama City, Florida. I'd talked with Bill maybe once in my life, when I was about six years old, but he reacted to my call without missing a beat. "Well," he said, "now that you bring it up, when I was little, Jack Kreamer simply wasn't mentioned." My grandfather's name was Jack! Bill had worked at the family bank in Downs during college summer breaks in the 1940's, and remembered one incident very specifically: his father saying, "I want to show you something," taking him into the big bank vault, and digging out a three-inch-thick bundle of 20-year-old checks, wrapped with adding machine tape, that totaled over $45,000.

"These are the checks that Jack Kreamer bounced trying to cover his gambling debts," Bill's father told him, "and your grandfather covered them with his own cash." The tone of disgust used by Bill's dad left his son in no doubt about the in-laws' regard for Jack—$45,000 in 1927 was the equivalent of half a million dollars today.

The picture in my mind of my grandfather became both cloudier and more exciting. Was he an embezzler or just an extravagant bettor?Or both?Where in the middle of nowhere, in the pious, Protestant plains of Prohibition, could Jack have gambled on that scale?How far would he have had to go—Kansas City is 200 miles east and Denver 400 miles west—to lose such a sum?Was it possible that my grandfather was still alive somewhere, a very old man living high off his bank spoils?Had he started a new family?I was imagining Newman and Redford in The Sting. And I knew that my father, who had loved mystery novels, would have delighted in my speculations.

I decided that one of the best ways to follow Jack's trail was through the bank. Jerry Berkeley, who bought the State Bank of Downs from my relatives in the 1970's, had known nothing about my grandfather's criminal history, but I turned him into a fellow detective. He uncovered a lawsuit, filed in 1930, alleging that J. H. Kreamer had left the county in 1927 to avoid being served with a summons relating to large debts he owed the Central Kansas Cattle Loan Co. Jim Vandergiesen, a contemporary of my grandparents, suggested that the "gambling" Jack had indulged in might have been something that in the 1920's they'd called "bucking the board." Folks would go to the "elevator," the local grain storage depot and market, and place a bid speculating on crop futures. Jim also whispered that a local woman, another contemporary, said that she'd "heard Jack Kreamer had done time." The very language was a little thrilling: I pushed on with my quest.

I learned that my grandfather had grown up in Jewell, Kansas, another small town (population 483), about 30 miles from Downs. Lucy and I drove to Jewell knowing absolutely no one there. We stopped at the town library and looked through local burial records. There I found my Kreamer relatives. Jack Kreamer's parents—my great-grandparents—and his sister Edith are buried in the Jewell cemetery. The librarian suggested we might pick up more information if we went to the Scoop, a local ice cream shop where a group of older women gathered every afternoon to drink coffee and chat.

We went. Betty James, a 72-year-old widow, stunned Lucy and me—accustomed as we were to the New York mind-your-own-business M.O.—by opening her house to us, two unknown travelers, in the old and pure way of Midwestern hospitality. At the city office next door to the Scoop, Lucy plowed through a book listing every graduate of Jewell High School for the past century, and hit upon the real key to our family history: Charlotte Kreamer, class of 1941. By phone that night I tracked down Charlotte, now 79 years old and living 90 miles away in Council Grove, Kansas, and her 87-year-old sister, Katherine, who lives in Holton, yet another little Kansas town, about 100 miles away. They are nieces of my grandfather Jack. Katherine was a flower girl at Jack and Catherine's wedding in 1921; both women had known my grandfather and spoke freely about him. They were the first people I'd ever known who did. "I don't know why he turned out to be the black sheep," Katherine said.

Their half sister, Margaret Ann, told me more: "Jack had a charming personality. My father"—Jack's brother Fred—"said he could sell a refrigerator to an Eskimo, and that he'd give you the shirt off his back." Margaret Ann had inherited her Aunt Edith Kreamer's belongings,including a photograph of my grandfather in his twenties, an up-and-coming young member of the Commerce Club of Jewell. I had never seen a picture of him before. I found myself staring at the face, both strange and familiar, seeing in his features my father's and my own. From some old letters of Edith's, I learned that she had been the one to send my grandfather, her little brother, away from Kansas in 1927. "When the trouble was slowly killing Grandfather Kreamer, I begged him [Jack] to go away as far as he could." In other words, the shock expressed in that original small-town newspaper story was, perhaps, somewhat disingenuous.

And I also discovered, in my great-aunt's papers, that in 1943 my grandfather Jack Kreamer died, at age 48, penniless and alone, working in a lumber camp in northern California. His sister Edith paid $3.50 for his headstone in Shasta County.

As my grandfather's story came into focus, I found that it had been no romantic caper after all, but something more complicated, even tragic—more like Theodore Dreiser or John Steinbeck than The Sting—and compelling in ways I hadn't anticipated and that will take time for me to digest.

I intend to stay in touch with this family I never knew about. And I'll continue to dig into my grandfather's financial shadow life and exile, and track his path west a few years ahead of the great Grapes of Wrath emigration. For Lucy and me, the outlines of a trip to northern California are already taking shape.

Are You Self-Medicating for the Anxieties du Jour? by Anne Kreamer

It's easy to dismiss reality TV as junk, but if you look a little deeper, you'll see why it's so popular. It's the same reason why books on Buddhism are selling: We all need some relief from the angst of the moment.

Are You Self-Medicating for the Anxieties du Jour? Anne Kreamer leisure, leisbooks It's easy to dismiss reality TV as junk, but if you look a little deeper, you'll see why it's so popular. It's the same reason why books on Buddhism are selling: We all need some relief from the angst of the moment.

Contrary to conventional cultural criticism, reality television does not represent the end of civilization as we know it. As inspirationally bereft as ABC's Are You Hot, Fox's The Glutton Bowl food show, NBC's Playboy Fear Factor, and the E network's Anna Nicole Smith series are, the frenzied popularity of this programming isn't difficult to understand: It's a way Americans can self-medicate. Obsessing over Michael Jackson's gothic lunacy or zooming in on the sweet pathetic nobodies on American Idol helps distract us from thinking and fretting about terrorism and the messiness of post-Iraqi-liberation all the time.

That's my take on the business-culture intersection. I checked it out with Joni Evans, consummate keeper of the business-culture flame. In her role as agent for Dr. Brian Weiss (author of Many Lives, Many Masters) and as a senior vice president at the William Morris Agency, the outfit responsible for bringing Who Wants to Be a Millionaire and The Weakest Link to the United States, Evans has a different view of the market's reaction to these reality offerings. "Reality TV isn't an escape from Iraq," Evans says. "What it illustrates is that people realize that nonfiction is more interesting than fiction." Nonfiction, in Evans's book, spans media offerings as diverse as the surface-only Survivor to below-the-surface chronicles like Bob Woodward's Bush at War. The cocktail-party circuit, Evans says, where real business also gets done, does consist of tough talk about substantive issues. "People are trying to make their own sense of reality," Evans says. "Is what's going on with the world good, or bad?"

My response to Evans: I don't think regular Americans are hearing what she's hearing. People who read Bush at War are also watching I'm A Celebrity -- Get Me Out of Here? I doubt it. I think real reality is so complicated and nervous-making right now that TV is giving us spectacularly inconsequential human comedy and calling it "reality." In some postmodern torque of irony, reality TV lets us keep our minds off of reality.

There's a second antianxiety medication that Americans are turning to: behavioral therapy, using techniques like meditation or relaxation. Here our cultural institutions are way ahead of the market. According to Publisher's Weekly, about 560 new spiritual and religious guides will be published this summer. Last December, a Gallup poll found that nearly 25% of all Americans are likely to choose a book about spirituality when selecting a book to read.

According to Evans, the current explosion in spirituality books has been building for a long time -- and predates the threat of war, the downward slide of the economy, and the other anxieties du jour. "The rise in spiritual publishing is a direct expression of our contemporary state of existential flux," Evans says. "How do we make sense of it all?"

What I found really interesting about those 560-odd pop-metaphysics summer books is the kinds of titles being released. I expected sanctimonious evangelical tracts. Instead, I was encouraged by many of the titles.

First, more than 60 of the titles were Zen- or Buddhist-related -- more than 10% of the books, even though only about 1% of Americans label themselves as Buddhist. As our leaders have hurtled us, for better or for worse, into quasi-permanent war, we are, if the book publishers have got it right, searching for meaning as well as calm. The best-seller status of Alice Sebold's The Lovely Bones proves that Americans will embrace tough content if it reveals glimmers of heartfelt hopefulness.

Kids have been onto this kind of literary self-therapy way ahead of grown-ups: This month's first printing of 6.8 million hardcover copies of the latest Harry Potter installment, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, demonstrates how smart kids are. Harry gets to beat Voldemort, the Osama bin Laden of fiction, repeatedly. That feels really good.

So the crazes for reality TV and pop spiritual books are different currents in the same cultural stream -- possibly because Americans intuitively understand what Franklin Roosevelt said about Depression-era national panic back in 1933: "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself -- nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror. . . ." And what showed up in the years immediately after FDR's famous exhortation? Fabulous pop-culture confections: all the classic screwball comedies, The Wizard of Oz, and Walt Disney's Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.

On the other hand, what followed those fanciful offerings was World War II.